State v. Keaten
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
Convicted of gross sexual misconduct, 17 — A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B), at a jury trial before the Superior Court in Cumberland County, the defendant, William R. Keaten, seeks review on the ground that the direct testimony of two witnesses, allegedly relevant to his defense of voluntary intoxication, was improperly excluded. Finding no error below, we deny the appeal.
For the resolution of this appeal, we need consider only the threshold question of whether voluntary intoxication could ever be a valid “defense” 1 to a charge of gross sexual misconduct under 17 — A M.R.S.A. §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. WorreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GiovaniniSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- State v. TaplinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- United States v. VelázquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- State v. AshleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.