State v. Cach

*747KISTLER, J.

The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Oregon Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division because it found that, as a result of a mental illness, he was a danger to others and unable to provide for his basic needs. Appellant argues that the court’s judgment should be reversed because the court failed to advise him of his rights under ORS 426.100. We affirm.

On March 11,1999, the trial court appointed counsel to represent appellant.1 The next day, appellant received a citation that, among other things, set out written advice about the nature of the…