United States v. Negro
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Defendant assigns as error the fact that the judge told the jury, “A conspiracy involves two persons. If you find Bruchon not guilty of conspiracy you must find Negro not guilty.” Defendant argues thus: (a) The indictment named as the conspirators the defendants, Bruchon, Negro, and “divers other persons to the Grand Jurors unknown.” (b) The record contains evidence, says defendant, from which the jury might have concluded that Negro conspired with persons other than Bruchon. (c) It was therefore a mistake to advise the jury that, if Bruchon was guiltless of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas ViscardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Peter Adamo Appeal of Vincent KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Susan Frank and Jane Frank KreschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Sammie Lee Davis and Jasper Edward BaccusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Orlando Napolitano v. United States of America, John F. Diraffaele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.