Legal Opinion

United States v. Negro

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 1947No. 43, Docket 20709PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Defendant assigns as error the fact that the judge told the jury, “A conspiracy involves two persons. If you find Bruchon not guilty of conspiracy you must find Negro not guilty.” Defendant argues thus: (a) The indictment named as the conspirators the defendants, Bruchon, Negro, and “divers other persons to the Grand Jurors unknown.” (b) The record contains evidence, says defendant, from which the jury might have concluded that Negro conspired with persons other than Bruchon. (c) It was therefore a mistake to advise the jury that, if Bruchon was guiltless of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas ViscardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Peter Adamo Appeal of Vincent KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Susan Frank and Jane Frank KreschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Sammie Lee Davis and Jasper Edward BaccusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Orlando Napolitano v. United States of America, John F. Diraffaele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API