Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. J.E.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.—
INTRODUCTION
For the third time this case comes before us on the issue of whether the lower court has correctly ordered an Indian child, Alexandria R, to be placed with her extended family, Ken R. and Ginger R., in Utah after concluding that Alexandria’s foster parents, the de facto parents, Russell P. and Summer R, failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that there was good cause to depart from the adoptive placement preferences set forth in the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.).1
We have twice remanded the matter because the lower…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Jasmon O.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marr. of Fregoso & HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. H.S. (In re Collin E.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. M.M. (In re Charlotte C.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Collin E.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- M.S. v. A.S.California Court of Appeal · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.