Legal Opinion

Roynon v. Battin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1942No. Civ. 2939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict in favor of all defendants and respondents in two consolidated actions instituted by plaintiff and appellant for false arrest and unlawful imprisonment. Two actions are involved in the present appeal, one in which the sheriff of San Bernardino County, E. L. Shay, and his deputies, Manning and Miller, are defendants, together with the Pacific Indemnity Company, as surety on the sheriff’s bond. The second is one wherein Constable Battin and the same surety company on his bond are defendants. The actions were consolidated for trial. The appeal is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Gisske v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Diefendorff v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Hoppe v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Gorlack v. FerrariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. Alonzo C.California Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API