State v. Savage

The defendant-appellant, Robert M. Savage, does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence which led to his conviction and concurrent sentences on two counts of trafficking in marijuana, resulting from two buys on two separate days one month apart.

I

The first assignment of error is that because a police informant bought the marijuana from him, appellant was “entrapped”; and, therefore, his rights to due process of law have been violated.

Upon careful consideration of the evidence in this case, we find, as a matter of law, that there was no entrapment.

II

The second assignment of error claims…