Legal Opinion
Erhart v. Evans
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 2001No. 00-284PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKite, J.
[11] Patrick Adam Erhart (the father) appeals the order in which the district court found three prior district court orders were issued pursuant to contempt proceedings and did not modify his child support obligation and entered & judgment of child support arrearages against him. We affirm.
ISSUES
[12] The father frames the issues for review as follows:
A. Did the court below err in finding that the support amount due from {[the father] to [the mother] had not been modified to reduce [the father's] child support obligation from $8300.00 per month to $250.00 per month?
B. Did the court below err…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Goss v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Fanning v. FanningWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Connors v. ConnorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Aragon v. AragonWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Ready v. ReadyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Beeman v. BeemanWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Zupan v. ZupanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Multiple Resort Ownership Plan, Inc. v. Design-Build-Manage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.