Legal Opinion

Taintor v. Franklin Nat. Bank of New York

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 13, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On Motion to Confirm Master’s Report and on Exceptions thereto. Frederick J. Moses, for the receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

The master was appointed to take proof of the claims against the Franklin National Bank and to fix and determine the compensation of the receiver and of his counsel. The *826master, after according a full hearing to all parties, filed, on January 14, 1901, a carefully considered report in which he passes upon all the questions so referred. Philip Carpenter, a creditor, filed exceptions to the master’s ruling disallowing a part of his own claim for services and he also excepted to the amount of compensation allowed to the receiver and his counsel. As stated at the argument the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. McCormick v. Market BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Camden v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Girard Insurance & Trust Co v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Meyer v. . LathropNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark Hardware Co. v. SauveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API