Legal Opinion
HOBBS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR OF LABOR
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 28, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00956Unknown
1Opinion
*NOT FOR PUBLICATION* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TAMECA HOBBS, Plaintiff, V. Civ. Action No. 22-00956 (GC) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF OPINION LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR OF LABOR, et ai., Defendants. CASTNER, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on two motions to dismiss the Complaint of pro se Plaintiff Tameca Hobbs (“Plaintiff”), which sets forth claims for violations of federal law and the U.S. Constitution, arising from Plaintiff's attempts to secure employment and a prior lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The United States…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.