Bloom v. Vauclain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,
Appellant supplied printed matter, “campaign cards,” to persons representing themselves as officers of the “Davis-Brown Campaign Committee,” an alleged politi cal organization functioning during the State election of 1930. Appellee Yauclain did not personally authorize this work to be done, and the burden was therefore on appellant to show that the purchases were made by the agents of appellee, with his authority. It appeared that appellee was treasurer of the so-called campaign committee and appellant endeavored to show he assented to the purchases. There…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCabe v. . GoodfellowNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Ash v. GuieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Edwards v. Heralds of LibertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Dunlap Printing Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Franklin Paper Co. v. GormanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Rich Printing Company v. McKellar's EstateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Duquesne Litho, Inc. v. Roberts & Jaworski, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Karl Rove & Co. v. ThornburghDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.