Legal Opinion
Karl Rove & Co. v. Thornburgh
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided June 16, 1993No. Civ. A 92 CA 266-SSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPARKS, District Judge.
The primary issue before the Court in the above-styled and numbered cause is whether or not Richard Thornburgh, a former candidate for the United States Senate, and/or Raymond P. Dimuzio, treasurer of Thorn-burgh’s designated principal campaign committee, may be held liable for a contract debt incurred by the principal campaign committee.
This case was tried before the Court, without a jury, on April 1 and 2, 1993. All parties were present and represented by counsel. Having carefully considered the evidence presented at trial, the arguments of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- John Clark Donatelli v. National Hockey LeagueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Mississippi Interstate Express, Inc. v. Transpo, Inc., Azcal, Inc. And Robert ZollerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Maxus Exploration Co. v. Moran Bros., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Valsangiacomo v. Americana Juice Import, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Duquesne Litho, Inc. v. Roberts & Jaworski, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Valsangiacomo, Cherubino, SA v. Americana Juice Import, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000