Legal Opinion

Kohlhoff v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1978No. 76-359-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

The defendant seeks reversal on two grounds: (1) The evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, (2) the response of the trial court to the request of the jury for testimony clarification constituted reversible error. In the alternative, the defendant asks that the judgment of conviction be reversed and the case be remanded for a new trial in the interests of justice.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the judgment and order of the trial court should be affirmed. Therefore no useful purpose will be served by an extensive detail of the testimony.

The defendant was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. TarrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mentek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Kanieski v. GagnonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Jones (George Michael) v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BurkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Boyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Haskins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. MacLin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API