Legal Opinion

Carlos Rene Rivas-Gomez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2006No. 03-72087PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

This petition for review raises the question of whether a conviction under Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) § 163.355 (rape in the third degree), which criminalizes as a felony “sexual intercourse with another person under 16 years of age,” constitutes an aggravated felony within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A). We conclude, as did the Immigration Judge (“IJ”), that it does. However, because the IJ erroneously applied a heightened standard when deciding whether to grant a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(c), we grant the petition in part and remand.

BACKGROUND

Carlos…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Rafael Baron-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Ahmed Ali v. Deborah Achim, Michael Chertoff, and Alberto Gonzales, Ahmed Ali v. Alberto GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Jean v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. Ali, Ahmed v. Achim, DeborahCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Ancheta v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API