Grandi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; John E. McCall, Judge. A. Grandi was convicted of knowingly receiving goods stolen from an interstate shipment in violation of Act Feb. 13, 1913, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error was convicted under the Act of Eeb. 13, 1913 (37 Stat. c. SO, p. 670 [Comp. St. §§ 8603, 8604]). The indictment contained three counts. The first charged the breaking of the seal of a certain railroad freight car containing an interstate shipment; the second, the stealing of goods from that car; and the third, the receipt and possession of goods knowing that they had been stolen from the car in question, and knowing that they were part of an interstate shipment contained in that car, which was alleged to be under transportation in interstate commerce…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- State v. MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- United States v. Tommy Joe BarrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Sparks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.