Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Weiers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 22, 2014No. 10ag/13PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16—751(a), filed a “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against Daun Robert Weiers (“Respondent” or “Weiers”) on April 15, 2013. Petitioner charged Respondent—admitted to the Bar of this Court on December 14, 1973—with violations of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MLRPC) 1.1 (Competence), 1 1.15(a) and (c) (Safekeeping Property), 2 1.5(a) (Fees), 3 8.1(b) (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 4 and 8.4(d) (Misconduct), 5 and Maryland Rules 16-606.1 (Attorney Trust…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WooleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.