London & L. Ins. v. Holt
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Minnehaha county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action upon a bond. Plaintiff had judgment, and appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. Respondents are not liable for moneys received after the date of the dissolution of the co partnership. Standard Oil Co. v. Armestad, (N. D.) 69 N. W. 197.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
This is an action to establish the liability of the defendants Kittredge and Edmison, as sureties on a bond given to secure the plaintiff, an insurance company, against all loss occasioned by,the failure of its agents, a co-partnership engaged in the insurance business under the firm name of Holt & Place, to pay over to the company monthly, or of tener, if demanded, all moneys received on account of the business transacted by said agents. Judgment tor $204.20, together with interest an'd costs, was demanded, and this appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment in its favor and against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crane Co. v. SpechtNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Watts v. BoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Standard Oil Co. v. ArnestadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- White Sewing Machine Co. v. HinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Penoyer v. WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. George E. Breece Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Friendly v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Shuttee v. Coalgate Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Hunt Oil Company v. KillionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957