Legal Opinion

Hoffee v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 19, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01497Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION KAREN HOFFEE, Case No. 3:18-cv-01497-AC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER V. WALMART INC., Defendant. ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge: Introduction Plaintiff Karen Hoffee (“Hoffee”) sues Defendant Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart”) for negligence. The claim arises from injuries Hoffee sustained when she slipped and fell on Walmart’s premises in McMinnville, Oregon. Walmart moves for summary judgment asserting there are no genuine issues of fact, and it is entitled to judgment as a matter oflaw. For the reasons set forth below, Walmart’s Motion for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API