Legal Opinion
Strunk v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 6, 2001No. 00-2251PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Karl Bryan Strunk appeals from a district court order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
In 1987, a Michigan jury convicted Strunk of first degree murder and felony firearm, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment. In his § 2254 petition, Strunk alleged that: 1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dewey W. Carson v. Luella BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- John Austin v. Andrew Jackson, Warden Huron Valley Men's FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Dwayne Allen Wright v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Allen 732946 v. DavidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- BELL v. MacauleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Barnette v. BuntingDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Bogard 243123 v. HortonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
- Brown v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.