Legal Opinion

In re W.D.P.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2004No. 26494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Bar Applicant W.D.P. (Applicant or Petitioner) timely petitioned for review of a Board of Bar Examiners’ hearing panel’s recommendation to deny Petitioner’s requests to sit for the Hawai'i bar examination and for admission to the Hawai'i bar. See Hawai'i Board of Bar Examiners Rules of Procedure (HBBE) § 4.4;1 Rule 1.3(e)2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH). We deny Petitioner’s request to sit for the Hawai'i bar examination and his Application for Admission to the Hawai'i Bar.

I. BACKGROUND

Petitioner submitted an application for admission to the Hawai'i bar on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. O'brien's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Florida Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re WDPHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NgHawaii Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API