Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. All Plumbing, Inc. Service, Parts, Installation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-0851PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs [38] Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification. Upon consideration of the pleadings, 1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs motion. Specifically, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs request for reconsideration of the conclusions in its previous Memorandum Opinion and Order. However, the Court clarifies two issues left unaddressed by its previous Memorandum Opinion and Order. First, Plaintiffs failure to properly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Heritage Insurance Co. v. Fun Services of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. All Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Richardson v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Foo v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Foo v. TillersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018