Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Parker

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 18, 2020No. 6:19-cv-00821Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION SARAH MERCER Case No. 6:19-cv-00821-AA OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL PARKER Defendant. AIKEN, District Judge: In this personal injury action, plaintiff Sarah Mercer alleges a negligence claim against defendant Michael Parker for injuries that she sustained from falling off a step in defendant’s home during an interaction with defendant’s dog. Defendant has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons below, the motion (doc. 9) is DENIED. BACKGROUND The following undisputed facts are drawn primarily from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Woolston v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mark Tauscher v. Phoenix Bd. of Realtors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Garrison v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API