Legal Opinion
Antoniou v. Thiokol Corp. Group Long Term Disability Plan
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 6, 1993No. 93-285-CIV-T-17BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This case before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, Docket # 7, filed April 2, 1993, and Defendant’s response, Docket # 13, filed May 11, 1993. For the following reasons, the motion for partial summary judgment is denied and the motion to strike affirmative defenses is denied.
This circuit clearly holds that summary judgment should only be entered when the moving party has sustained its burden of showing the absence of the genuine issue…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Antoniou v. Thiokol Corp. Group Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Eckert v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002