Spakes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted Appellant of escape and assessed his punishment at sixty years imprisonment after finding that he was a habitual offender. This conviction was reversed because the trial court failed to submit a requested instruction on the defense of necessity. Spakes v. State, 891 S.W.2d 7 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1994).
The State’s petition was granted to determine whether a predicate to the defense of necessity, as applicable to the offense of escape, includes an attempt to surrender once the immediate threat justifying the escape has ceased.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Spares v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
4Cited by29 opinions
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- United States v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State v. FrancoisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Shugart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.