Johnson v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This matter was commenced by the filing of a petition (the “Petition”) for return of property, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e). The petitioners, Christopher D. Johnson and John M. Dinan (collectively the “Petitioners”) are “Joint Official Liquidators of an Unnamed Financial Institution, formerly a bank and trust company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands, with offices in George Town, Grand Cayman” (the “Offshore Bank”). Petition at 1-2. Petitioners seek the “return of one or more computer tapes” (the “Tape”) containing operating…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chaim v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008