Legal Opinion

State v. Glasgow

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2008No. WD 68102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

Ervin L. Glasgow appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of the Class C felony of stealing. He claims that the conviction violated his right to be free from double jeopardy because the circuit court had ruled orally that he was guilty of the Class A misdemeanor of stealing. He asserts that the oral ruling constituted an acquittal of the Class C felony of stealing. We disagree and affirm the circuit court’s judgment.

The State charged Glasgow as a prior offender of robbery in the second degree. Glasgow waived his right to a jury trial. After a trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Smalis v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. NeherSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  5. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KamakaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. HortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CLYDE CLEVELAND WHITEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Christopher A. Scott v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API