Legal Opinion

Clements v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 7, 1992No. 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Appellant, Rosetta Wimberly Clements, et al. (Clements), sued the Respondent, W.H. Young (Young), in trespass to try title to 5.4 acres in Aiken, South Carolina. The case was heard by a special referee with direct appeal to the Supreme Court. The referee found in favor of Young and set the boundary line at a previously established tie line. At trial, the referee’s recording equipment did not work properly and no record of the testimony was recorded. Clements moved to reconstruct the record. The Supreme Court remanded to the special referee for an order reconstructing as much of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Southern Realty & Investment Co. v. KeenanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bodiford v. Spanish Oaks Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Jordan v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Williams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API