Bizzell v. . Roberts
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal front Peebles, J., at August Term, 1911, of WayNe. Civil action beard on demurrer to complaint. There was judgment overruling the demurrer, and defendants excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
It appeared in the complaint that on 3 March, 1909, defendants J. B. Koberts and Julia Kate Roberts became indebted to plaintiff in the aggregate sum of $2,750, payable by installments and evidenced by the promissory notes of said defendants under seal.
1. For $600, payable sixty days after date.
2. For $500, payable one year after date.
3. For $500, payable two years after date.
4. For $500, payable, three years after date.
5. For $650, payable four years after date.
There was mortgage on real estate securing said indebtedness and containing the stipulation that if default be made on the payment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Gore v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Van Vlissingen v. LenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Smalley v. RenkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Hilliard v. . NewberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Bundy v. . Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Bundy v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Crockett v. FIRST FEDERAL S. & L. ASS'N, ETC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Lewis v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.