Legal Opinion

Crotwell v. Whitney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 1956No. 17150PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Justice.

The children of Samuel P. Crotwell brought this action to recover from William B. Whitney and Julius Titus a tract of land in Newberry County comprising about three hundred twenty acres. Joined as defendants were Willie D. Summer, a predecessor in title to Whitney, and Arthur State Bank, Whitney’s mortgagee. Plaintiffs founded their claim of title upon a deed executed by their father; defendants pleaded a tax deed, adverse possession, presumption of a grant, and laches. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, only Whitney and the bank have appealed.

James A. Crotwell,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. McGee v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  3. Haithcock v. HaithcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. Knight v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  5. Terwilliger v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Twelfth RMA Partners, L.P. v. National Safe Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina, Also Known as the Catawba Nation of South Carolina v. State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Miller v. LeairdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API