Legal Opinion

STEVE HARMAN v. MANHEIM REMARKETING, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2015No. SD33414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, J.

Opinion author

Steve Harman appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of .Manheim Remarketing, Inc. (“Manheim”), holding that Harman’s civil action against Manheim for his injuries from a fall on Manheim’s premises was barred by The Workers’ Compensation Law, see sections 287.010-.811. Harman claims that Man-heim was not entitled to summary judgment because section 287.280.1, 1 gives him the right to bring a civil action against Manheim if Manheim failed to insure its full workers’ compensation liability, as re quired by that section, and there are no uncontroverted facts in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. John Templemire v. W&M Welding, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nathan Blanton v. KC Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API