Legal Opinion

Succession of de Egana

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1866PublishedCited by 10 opinions

— On a Motion to Dismiss. APPEAL from tbe Second District Court of New Orleans,

1Opinion of the CourtTt.rt.ev, J.

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss ; and a refer-

ence to some of the most prominent facts is, we think, necessary for a proper understanding, and a correct appreciation, of the grounds upon which the motion is submitted.

On the 11th January, 1864, the judgment now complained of was rendered, and on the 1st February, of the same year, after a trial which lasted four days, on the appellee’s prayer for a rehearing, was reaffirmed and maintained by the lower Court.

On the 23d of the same month, the’appellees were ruled’ to show cause “ why they should not forthwith comply with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lesley v. RandolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. State v. Judge of the Parish Court of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Foster & Glassell Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Raines v. DunsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Jolley v. Vivian Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. State Ex Rel. Parish of Plaquemines v. BaynardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  5. Cory v. AskewLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API