Legal Opinion

State v. Judge of the Parish Court of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1843PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Rule to show cause why a mandamus should not be issued to the judge of the Parish Court of New Orleans.

1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.

Certain proceedings having been instituted by L. B. Macarty, to obtain the seizure and sale of property specially hypothecated to secure a note of seven thousand dollars, due him by one Scates, which property had been conveyed by a deed of sale to J. A. Spalding, who, in the said deed, had assumed the reversion of the mortgage; it became necessary to appoint a curator ad hoc to represent Spalding, who is an absentee. Langdon Elwyn, Esq., an attorney at law, was appointed to represent him, and such proceedings were subsequently had, contradictorily with him, as were necessary to execute the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Macarty v. FoucherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1822

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foster & Glassell Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Jolley v. Vivian Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Succession of de EganaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
  4. State ex rel. Mutual Building & Homestead Ass'n v. Judges of the Court of AppealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. Cory v. AskewLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API