Legal Opinion

Matter of Adoption of Gibson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 1983No. 1181, CA A22688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*770ROSSMAN, J.

In this adoption proceeding, mother and stepfather, petitioners, contend that consent by the biological father, respondent, is not required, because he has either (1) wilfully deserted his two minor children or (2) wilfully neglected them without just and sufficient cause for one year next preceding the filing of the petition for adoption. ORS 109.324. The trial court found against mother and stepfather on both grounds and ordered the adoption petition dismissed. They appeal. We reverse and remand.

JURISDICTION

The original notice of appeal in this case stated that “Appellant hereby…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. OMLIE ET UX v. HuntOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Moody v. VoorhiesOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mahoney v. LinderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Berry v. LetchworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Street v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In re the Marriage of HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Mead v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Walmer v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API