Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 1990No. CV 89-50; CA A63742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Appellant petitions for review of our order dismissing his appeal from a judgment of dissolution because of a lack of timely service of the notice of appeal on respondent.1 We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), allow it and adhere to our previous order.

The trial court entered judgment in this proceeding on January 11, 1990. On February 9, appellant’s attorney sent a notice of appeal by first class mail to the trial court reporter and the Umatilla County Trial Court Administrator, as required by ORS 19.028(2).2 However, the copy sent to respondent’s attorney was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jordan v. WiserOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Street v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Guinasso v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCall v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. McKinney v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Morse Bros. v. Kemp Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Woods v. Carl Karcher Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API