Lucas v. Pietkevich
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
There was evidence from which it could be found that the staging in question was defective and that the defect therein caused the plaintiff’s injury. The defendant does not deny this fact but claims that the staging was erected under the supervision of the plaintiff himself and that the case therefore comes within the rule of Frame v. Houston, 78 N. H. 375, and McIntyre v. McIntyre, 86 N. H. 479.
The staging was about seventy feet long and extended all around the barn. At the time of the accident the plaintiff was nailing up one of the cornice boards and was standing at the right-hand corner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Haakensen v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
- Thompson v. BartlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
- Tierney v. New England Granite WorksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. KimballSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
- Pike v. GagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940