Legal Opinion
Rohn v. Weld County Bank
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 28, 1964No. 20600PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Day.
Plaintiff in error will be referred to as Elizabeth; defendant in error as the Bank; other persons to whom it will be necessary to refer are Oscar (husband of Elizabeth) and Oscar, Jr. (son of Elizabeth and Oscar).
The Bank sued Elizabeth in the Weld County District Court on a contract of “guarantee.” Trial was to the court, and judgment was in favor of the Bank and against Elizabeth in the amount of $9825.49 plus costs.
Writ of error is directed to the judgment on the ground that the court erred as a matter of law in interpreting the “guarantee” contract of Elizabeth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce of Kansas City, Mo. v. RockefellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- First National Bank v. StoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- First National Bank of Waterloo v. . StoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- First Nat. Bank v. StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trego WaKeeney State Bank v. MaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Colonial Bank of Alabama v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Farmers State Bank v. DoeringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Highlands Ranch University Park, LLC v. Uno of Highlands Ranch, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.