Legal Opinion
Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2014No. 13-1029, 13-1046PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
In October 2004, Cellport Systems, Inc. (“Cellport”) and Peiker Acustie GMBH & Co. KG (“Peiker”) entered into an agreement concerning Cellport’s technology for the hands-free use of cellphones in vehicles. In 2009, Cellport filed suit against Peiker, alleging breach of that agreement and seeking royalties for seven Peiker products. The district court awarded Cell-port royalties on only two of the products, interpreting an acknowledgment in the license agreement as “a rebuttable presumption.” Cellport appealed, and Peiker filed a conditional cross-appeal. We affirm in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Cummings v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Rio Grande Foundation v. Toulouse OliverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- First American Title Insurance v. Northwest Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Grice v. CVR Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.