Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. One Dodge Motor Truck
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 1936No. Appeals, 216 and 217PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
American Motor Lines is a partnership engaged in the transportation of freight by motor truck between Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Baltimore, Maryland, Cumberland, Maryland, and Washington, D. C. In the conduct of its business the firm hired Charles A. Stambaugh to drive his Dodge motor truck for it as might be directed. Neither the partnership, nor any of its members, nor the said Stambaugh, had complied with the provisions of the Act of Assembly of this Commonwealth of December 8, 1933, Special Session of 1933-34, P. L. 57, which provides, inter alia, in section 3,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ziffrin, Inc. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Spankard's Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. One 1939 Cadillac SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Irvis v. ScottDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.