State v. Segines
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Melody J. Stewart, Judge.
{¶ 1} Pursuant to App.R. 26(B), we have reopened the appeal of defendant-appellant, Richard Segines, in light of a demonstrated case of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel that occurred when counsel neglected to raise an issue under State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008-Ohio-1624, 885 N.E.2d 917, challenging the state’s failure to include a mens rea element in an indictment charging aggravated robbery under R.C. 2911.01(A)(3). Segines now argues that the predicate murder count is necessarily affected by the defect in the indictment because the jury could…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SeginesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. DzelajlijaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DzelajlijaOhio Court of Appeals · 2011