Legal Opinion

State v. Segines

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2010No. 89915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melody J. Stewart, Judge.

{¶ 1} Pursuant to App.R. 26(B), we have reopened the appeal of defendant-appellant, Richard Segines, in light of a demonstrated case of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel that occurred when counsel neglected to raise an issue under State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008-Ohio-1624, 885 N.E.2d 917, challenging the state’s failure to include a mens rea element in an indictment charging aggravated robbery under R.C. 2911.01(A)(3). Segines now argues that the predicate murder count is necessarily affected by the defect in the indictment because the jury could…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SeginesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. DzelajlijaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. DzelajlijaOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API