Thames v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge
The law as enunciated in Bean v. State (1984) Ind., 460 N.E.2d 936, and subsequent cases separates the victim’s status as a dependent of someone from the neglect perpetrated by a third person.1 For this reason, I concur.
The traditional analysis of neglect and dependency focused upon the parent-child, child-parent relationship, or at a minimum upon a loco parentis relationship, e.g., a guardian. See Dirk William de Roos Dependency and Neglect: Indiana’s Definitional Confusion 45 Ind.L.J. 606 (1970). It did not embrace temporary custodians such as babysitters.
In any event, it seems that the law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bean v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Hill v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Shoup v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SpringerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992