Hill v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Gina Hill (Hill) appeals her jury convietion of neglect of a dependent, a class B felony.
We affirm.
First, Hill challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending that she was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have knowingly committed the offense charged: knowingly and intentionally placing Barry Janczewski, a dependent in her care, in a situation which may have endangered his life or health, to-wit: failing to obtain medical treatment for him which resulted in serious bodily injury, to-wit: death.
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we refuse to reweigh…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Armour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ware v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Perkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Mallory v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hastings v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Commonwealth v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Shipley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.