Legal Opinion

Tweed v. Lowe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first judicial district, county of Pima, entered in favor of the plaintiffs, and from an order denying the defendant a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

By Court,

Pinney, J.:

The complaint alleges that Samuel A. Lowe located the El Capitán mine in September, 1877, and that defendant William N. Tweed asserted title to and claims to be the owner of an undivided one half interest in said mine by virtue of a written agreement, which claim, it is alleged, is without any right whatever, etc. In the prayer it is asked that the defendant may be required to set forth the nature of his claim, and that a decree may be granted declaring and adjudging that plaintiffs are the owners of said mine, and *489that defendant has no estate or interest whatever in said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Mayhew v. BrislinArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. City of Bisbee v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API