Legal Opinion

In Re Texas Mutual Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 21, 2012No. 05-11-01505-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

Texas Mutual Insurance Company (“Texas Mutual”) seeks a writ of prohibition that the trial court is limited to awarding attorney’s fees as stated in the mandate issued by the clerk of this court after an appeal of the case underlying this proceeding. Additionally, it seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to vacate its overly broad discovery order. We conditionally grant both writs.

Texas Mutual, a workers’ compensation insurance carrier, sued Ralf G. Boetsch to appeal an administrative determination that Boetsch was disabled as a result of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lee v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las ColinasTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re Assurances Generales Banque Nationale, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Boetsch, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  3. in Re: Amy E. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API