Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1976PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Whether defendant’s confession was voluntarily given and thus admissible against him involved only a factual determination, which having been made in favor of the People at County Court and thereafter affirmed at the Appellate Division, is beyond the scope of our review. In passing we observe that no claim was advanced at the suppression hearing based on assertions that defendant had been illegally detained. Moreover illegality, if any, of a detention is only one of the factors to be considered on the issue of voluntariness…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. GlinsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API