City of Cambridge v. Board of Railroad Commissioners
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMortOn, J.
These are petitions for certiorari and for mandamus against the board of railroad commissioners, and are both based oil the same facts. Two petitions were brought, owing to the uncertainty as to which was the proper remedy. The cases were heard together, before a single justice, who found and ruled in favor of the petitioner, and reported the cases to this court for its decision as to whether certiorari or mandamus, or both or neither, should issue. The admissibility of certain evidence is also involved. At the hearing before the single justice, the city of Boston and the Boston and Albany…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CoombsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Clark v. New England Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Inhabitants of Agawam v. County of HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- People Ex Rel. Mutual Life Insurance v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Richards v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Gifford v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Public Service Commission v. Fort Wayne Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Scudder v. Selectmen of SandwichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- First Church of Christ v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.