Legal Opinion

Richards v. County Commissioners

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 20, 1876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The petitioners ask for a writ of mandamus, requiring the county commissioners to construct and complete parts of Main Street and Elm Street in the town of Attleborough, which the petition states they had widened, straightened and located anew, but which that town had refused to make and complete under the commissioners’ order.

The answer, signed by the commissioners, admits the facts stated in the petition; but denies that the roads in question were highways or county roads at the time of the order, averring that Elm Street was a town way; and, as to Main Street, referring to the case of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Inhabitants of Hyde Park v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CoupeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. State ex rel. Winterburg v. DemareeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Foster v. Board of Park CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Lincoln v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. McCarthy v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API