Legal Opinion

W. X. Huber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 8, 1943No. C. D. 793PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Judge:

In this case the question is presented whether unfinished tennis and badminton racket frames are entitled to classification under the provisions of paragraph 1502 of the Tariff Act of 1930, or are properly dutiable, as assessed by the collector, under the general provision for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for A sample of the articles involved is in evidence as illustrative exhibit A and consists of a bare frame which has been drilled to accommodate the gut ultimately to be strung thereon. It has not been lacquered or varnished, nor has the handle been fitted with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. M. & J. Herrman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Protest 90481-K of McMinn & Davis Co.United States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API