Legal Opinion

Wanamaker v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1926No. 2671PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Finished wooden frames for tennis rackets, requiring only to be properly strung to constitute finished tennis rackets, were classified and assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 410 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

*28We quote the relevant part thereof:

* * * manufactures of wood or bark, or of which wood or bark is the-component material of chief value.

Importer, protested the collector’s action, claiming classification-under paragraph 1402 of the act, which is as follows:

Boxing gloves, baseballs, footballs, tennis balls, golf balls, and all other balls, of whatever material composed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wimpeheimer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M. & J. Herrman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API