Legal Opinion

Estate of Sullivan v. Sullivan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The question, presented upon this appeal requires an interpretation of sec. 318.01 (2), Stats., already set out. On behalf of the petitioner it is argued that the statute is mandatory; that it was the duty of the court to make a reasonable allowance out of the estate, and that refusal of the court to make the petitioner any allowance was erroneous. On the other hand, it is argued that the statute is purely discretionary; that the widow has received certain insurance moneys and other resources, and that it would be equitable to deny her support under the statute, under all the facts and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKenney v. MinahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. Carpenter v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Thomas v. SternhagenNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hughes v. VeltenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Mayer v. MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API