Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Velten

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

In the usual proceeding in matters in probate, the executor or administrator represents all parties adverse to the claimant, and notice of appeal served on him is a sufficient notice to “the adverse party” within the meaning of sec. 274.11 (1), Stats. In the case of Estate of Koch, 148 Wis. 548, 134 N. W. 663, where notice of appeal was served upon the personal representative of the deceased, it is said (p.571):

“He stood for all [adverse] interests. . . . The only necessary party adverse to the claimant was the personal representative. All interested in the estate, in the collective sense,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McKenney v. MinahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Estate of Bailey v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Estate of KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Paulson v. PaulsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Carpenter v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HermSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Baker v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Smith by Young v. Estate of KingMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Matter of Estate of McClerkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Estate of RichardsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API