Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Management
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2010No. 05-35931PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The parties’ Joint Motion Requesting Amendment of Opinion and Remand is GRANTED. Although motions to amend substantial portions of opinions by incorporating specific language proposed by parties as part of a settlement are disfavored and will rarely be granted, in this instance the panel has determined, after careful review, that the proposed amendment fully conforms to Ninth Circuit and United States Supreme Court law regarding the relief accorded in a NEPA case and would be appropriate relief if requested by the plaintiff independently. In light of this disposition, the appellees’…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Western Watersheds Project v. Bob AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Center for Environmental Law & Policy v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- North Carolina Wildlife Federation v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.